|
|
|
Click on photo to view larger image
Girl
© 2005 mdominic
|
| | |
|
Author
|
|
Thread
|
|
|
molaselake
Liz
Registered: June 2004
Posts: 285
|
|
Mon June 6, 2005 4:05pm
|
Rating: 7.00
|
|
I really like the lighting in this picture and how soft it is. Im not distracted by anything on the side, but i am distracted by the lopsided buttcheeks....yeah...i wish they weren't lopsided.
|
|
|
|
Axle
SG-1
Registered: December 2004
Posts: 1470
|
|
Wed April 6, 2005 5:41am
|
Rating: 8.00
|
|
Very tasteful. Although like Almo, I do notice the objects in the background to the left of the subject which is disctracting. They are partically hidden in the shadow which does help, a bit.
But other than that, nicly done. I've shot one roll of Illford myself, and well I loved it!
------------------------------
Alex :: D300 /w MB-D10, F3, D70s, F80
Rom 12:2a Eph 5:18
My PR Gallery | My Site | PR Blog | flickr | redbubble
|
|
|
|
|
almo
Eye see you!
Registered: February 2003
Posts: 4605
|
|
Sat April 2, 2005 11:14pm
|
Rating: 8.00
|
|
I can see some stuff in the background to the left of the subject, this is very distracting to me. Also you can see the bottom of her hair. I find this less distracting, but quite sloppy. Otherwise this shot is great. Ilford is possibly my favorite film and you have used it beautifully. The lighting could not be more exsquiset.
If I were you i would stick with "Naked at Midnight", it is a much better and more fitting name. "Woman" might have been a better choice as well.
------------------------------
John Cowan
Always do sober what you said you'd do drunk. That will teach you to keep your mouth shut.
~Ernest Hemingway~
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Powered by: PhotoPost PHP vB3 Enhanced
Copyright 2005 All Enthusiast, Inc.
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:18 PM.
|
|
|
